Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-06 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.57 x 3.07 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.17 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Titan gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 174.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 264 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 has a global score of 77, which is a bit better than LG K51's 71.1 overall score. Although the LG V20 is much older than LG K51, it's construction is just a little thinner and lighter. LG K51 has a bit superior processing unit than LG V20, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The LG V20 features a more vivid screen than LG K51, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher number of pixels per display inch and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. LG V20 has a better memory for applications and games than LG K51, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V20 also has 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
LG K51 features improved battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The LG V20 has a way better camera than LG K51, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG V20 also has a larger back camera sensor, a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with more megapixels.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG V20 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.