Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has a score of 79.1, which is a little bit better than the LG K51S's 74.3 general score. The LG V30 construction is lighter and thinner than LG K51S, although it was released 3 years before. The LG V30 features a much better looking screen than LG K51S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a much higher pixels amount per screen inch.
The LG V30 counts with a little better processing power than LG K51S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG K51S has a little bit better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V30, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG K51S also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 2 TB.
LG K51S features better battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The LG V30 has a superior camera than LG K51S, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better video resolution.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG K51S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG K51S. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG V30, else you can save some dollars and get the LG K51S, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.