Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-27 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is better than the LG K51S's global score of 74.3. LG V50 ThinQ is a a little bit lighter phone than LG K51S, but they have the same thickness. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
LG V50 ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than LG K51S, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ features an incredibly better looking screen than LG K51S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a way higher display density.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a better camera than LG K51S, because although it has a lot less MP resolution camera, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a greater memory capacity for games and applications than LG K51S, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 48 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ's battery lifetime is very similar to LG K51S's battery duration.
The LG V50 ThinQ costs more than LG K51S, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.