Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
64 GB| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is just a bit better than LG K51S, with a score of 77.9 against 74.3. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the newer 4.4.4 version while LG K51S has Android 10, providing the user a couple nice extra features. The Motorola DROID Turbo is a noticeably older and extremely thicker phone than the LG K51S, but Motorola made it a little lighter anyway.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with an incredibly better display than LG K51S, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a way better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo features just a little better hardware performance than LG K51S, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an additional graphics processor.
LG K51S has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG K51S also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 2 TB. The LG K51S has just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 3 percent more battery size.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a better camera than LG K51S, because although it has a lot less mega pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a much higher video quality.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.