Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the LG K51S's overall score of 74.3. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version and LG K51S has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S6 edge+ is an noticeably older cellphone than LG K51S, but it is thinner and way lighter anyway.
The LG K51S counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a lot better looking display than LG K51S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a way higher pixel amount per screen inch.
The LG K51S counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG K51S also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB. LG K51S has better battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a superior camera than LG K51S, because although it has a much lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG K51S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG K51S. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG K51S, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.