Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZ3 has a global score of 79.6, which is a bit better than LG K51S's 74.3 overall score. Sony Xperia XZ3's body is older, thicker and a little heavier than the LG K51S. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Sony Xperia XZ3 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and LG K51S has Android 10.
Xperia XZ3 features a bit more powerful CPU than LG K51S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xperia XZ3 also has 1 GB more RAM memory. The Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with an incredibly better looking display than LG K51S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater display pixels density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The Sony Xperia XZ3 features a superior camera than LG K51S, because although it has a back camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition. The LG K51S counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K51S also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 2 TB.
The LG K51S has better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Xperia XZ3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG K51S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG K51S. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG K51S, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.