Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-23 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is better than the LG K52, getting a score of 84.5 against 76. Apple iPhone XS Max is a older and heavier phone than LG K52, but Apple was able to build it just a little thinner anyway. The iPhone XS Max has a lot better looking screen than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels.
LG K52 features a very superior memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG K52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The iPhone XS Max counts with a quite better hardware performance than LG K52, because although it has lesser CPU cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS Max features a little bit better camera than LG K52, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a lot smaller back camera sensor which gives a way worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same aperture, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
LG K52 features improved battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 26 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.