Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 is much better than the LG K52, with a global score of 86.5 against 76. Although it's the best device we compare here, Galaxy M31's design is just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the LG K52. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy M31 has 11 version while LG K52 has Android 10, so it provides you a couple additional features.
Samsung Galaxy M31 features a sharper screen than LG K52, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a lot more pixels per display inch. Galaxy M31 counts with a little bit better performance than LG K52, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy M31 also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG K52 counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a much longer battery performance than LG K52, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy M31 features a way better camera than LG K52, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy M31 also has a bigger sensor, a much more MP back camera and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.