Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s has a global score of 88, which is much better than LG K52's 76 global score. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M31s has newer 11 version while LG K52 has Android 10, so it offers some extra features and a performance increase. Although it's the best phone in this review, it must be told that it's also just a bit heavier and thicker.
The Galaxy M31s features a much better screen than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per display inch and a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. LG K52 features slightly more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy M31s features a bit better processor than LG K52, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy M31s also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy M31s takes way better pictures and videos than LG K52, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy M31s also has a back camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution, a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Galaxy M31s features a much better battery lifetime than LG K52, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.