Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 266 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than the LG K52, with an 80.1 score against 76. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an a lot thicker and extremely heavier phone than LG K52. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while LG K52 has Android 10 version, giving lots of additional features.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much sharper display than LG K52, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The LG K52 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG K52 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little faster processing unit than LG K52. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The LG K52 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the LG K52 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little longer battery performance than LG K52, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.