Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-23 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ3 is just a bit better than LG K52, having a 79.6 score against 76. These devices come with Android OS, but Xperia XZ3 has a newer 9.0 Pie version and LG K52 has Android 10 version, counting with lots of additional features and enhanced performance. Although it's the best we are comparing here, it must be noted that it is also an extremely older, thicker and just a bit heavier device.
The Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a much more vibrant display than LG K52, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a much higher screen pixel density. The Sony Xperia XZ3 has just a bit better hardware performance than LG K52. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM.
LG K52 counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG K52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG K52 features better battery life than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a 20% more battery capacity.
Xperia XZ3 counts with just a bit better camera than LG K52, because although it has a smaller aperture, a much less MP back-facing camera and a tinier sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, it also counts with a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.