Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than LG K62, having a general score of 81.6 against 78.2. Google Pixel 2's body is a little bit thinner and way lighter than the LG K62, although it was released 3 years before. Google Pixel 2's processing unit is very similar to LG K62's CPU, they have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a better looking display than LG K62, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a way greater pixels density. LG K62 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG K62 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K62 has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2700mAh. LG K62 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the LG K62 also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.