Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is a bit better than LG K62's 78.2 score. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 operating system. LG V50 ThinQ is a a little lighter device than the LG K62, but they are equally thin. LG V50 ThinQ has an incredibly better looking screen than LG K62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better display pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little better hardware performance than LG K62, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ features as much storage capacity for apps and games as the LG K62, they have equal 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ and LG K62 have extremely similar batteries. LG V50 ThinQ captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG K62, because although it has a lot tinier sensor and a much worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.