Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31 has a score of 86.5, which is better than LG K62's global score of 78.2. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy M31's body is just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than LG K62. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M31 has 11 version and LG K62 has Android 10 version, giving you lots of additional features and improved performance.
Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a little faster processor than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy M31 counts with a brighter display than LG K62, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The LG K62 counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M31, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M31 features a very superior battery performance than LG K62, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a much better camera than LG K62, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.