Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K62 has a general score of 78.2, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. The LG K62 design is lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's much thicker and was released 3 years before. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but LG K62 has the previous 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
LG K62 counts with a way better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better display than LG K62, because it has a bigger screen, a lot greater display pixel density and a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than LG K62, because it has a back-facing camera with more MP, a larger aperture for better low-light captures and videos, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a slightly better storage for apps and games than LG K62, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery performance than LG K62, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.