Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Titan gray | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is a little bit better than the iPhone 8's 85 overall score. LG K92's design is way newer, but notably heavier and somewhat thicker than the iPhone 8. The Apple iPhone 8 features a bit more vivid screen than LG K92, although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, a way worse 750 x 1334 resolution and a lot smaller screen.
IPhone 8 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG K92, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. LG K92 takes much better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and the same aperture, the LG K92 also counts with a lot bigger sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
The LG K92 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 counts with a superior battery life than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG K92 is also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.