Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Titan gray | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is slightly better than the iPhone XS Max, having an 85.4 score against 84.5. The LG K92 body is a lot newer and a bit lighter, but also a little thicker than iPhone XS Max. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a more powerful processing unit than LG K92, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a much better screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1242 x 2688px. The LG K92 counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
LG K92 shoots much better videos and photos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a way larger camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos and a lot more MP back facing camera.
The LG K92 features longer battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3179mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG K92 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.