Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 2's overall score of 81.6. Even though LG K92 is a lot newer than the Google Pixel 2, it's incredibly heavier and a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 2 has a bit better screen than LG K92, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a bit higher screen pixels density.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG K92, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. LG K92 counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG K92 also has a camera with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution and a way larger back camera sensor.
LG K92 features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG K92 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG K92 features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy LG K92, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 2, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.