Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Titan gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is better than LG V20, having an 85.4 score against 77. LG K92 is a incredibly newer cellphone than the LG V20, although it is just a little thicker and heavier. LG K92 features a bit better CPU than LG V20, because it has a larger number of cores (although slower) and more RAM. LG V20 features a little more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of display.
The LG K92 has a greater memory for apps and games than LG V20, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has more internal memory. LG K92 takes much clearer videos and photos than LG V20, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG K92 also has a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
LG K92 counts with improved battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V20. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the LG K92, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG V20, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.