Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is a little bit better than LG V30's 79.1 score. LG K92's design is incredibly newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than the LG V30. The LG V30 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG K92, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
LG V30 features a bit more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG K92 has a better camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor and a much more MP back-facing camera.
The LG K92 features a bigger memory for games and applications than LG V30, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 128 GB internal storage. The LG K92 counts with greater battery life than LG V30, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG K92 costs more money than the LG V30, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.