Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Titan gray | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is slightly better than the LG V50 ThinQ, having an 85.4 score against 83.7. The LG K92 is a just a bit heavier device than the LG V50 ThinQ, but both of them are 0.33inches thick. Both devices we are comparing include the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding operating system features.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a little better performance than LG K92. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. LG V50 ThinQ features a slightly better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
LG K92 takes much better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a much better resolution back camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ has as much memory for applications and games as the LG K92, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has a battery life that is just as good as LG K92's battery life.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V50 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V50 ThinQ, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.