Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Titan gray | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 395.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is a bit better than Moto G Stylus, having an 85.4 score against 79.7. These phones work with Android operating system, but LG K92 has the older 10 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. Although the LG K92 and Moto G Stylus were only released 7 months apart, LG K92's design is a little bit heavier but just a little thinner than Moto G Stylus.
LG K92 features a little faster processing unit than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG K92 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G Stylus and LG K92 both count with quite similar displays, because although the Motorola Moto G Stylus has a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2300 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density.
The LG K92 features just a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same camera sensor size and the same video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a lot more megapixels camera. LG K92 has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto G Stylus and LG K92 both feature incredibly similar batteries duration.
The LG K92 costs more than the Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.