Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Titan gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), with an 85.4 score against 84.2. LG K92 is a much newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), but it is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a little more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2220 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixels density.
Galaxy A7 (2018) features a little faster CPU than LG K92. They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. LG K92 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K92 has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. LG K92 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photos or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back, a way bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.