Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Titan gray | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is slightly better than LG K92, with a 91.8 score against 85.4. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter cellphone than LG K92, even when they were released only 5 months apart.
Galaxy A71 5G features a bit better screen than LG K92. Both of them have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the same count of pixels in each inch in the display and a screen with the same size. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than LG K92. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G has just a bit better camera than LG K92, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, a 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos.
LG K92 has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better battery performance than LG K92, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy A71 5G is also cheaper than the LG K92.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.