Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, having an 85.4 score against 82.1. Although LG K92 is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, it's a bit thicker and a little heavier. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but the LG K92 has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy A8 Star features a bit better processing power than LG K92. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy A8 Star counts with a display that's very similar to the LG K92 one, although the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has a little lower display pixels density, a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution.
LG K92 features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a much larger camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
The LG K92 features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.