Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-06 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is just a bit better than the Galaxy M30s, getting a global score of 85.4 against 83.3. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG K92 has an older 10 version and Galaxy M30s has Android 11 version. LG K92's design is newer and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy M30s's, although it's just a little heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s features a little bit better hardware performance than LG K92, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy M30s counts with a bit sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG K92 features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The LG K92 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same back-facing camera sensor size, the LG K92 also has a lot more mega pixels back camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography.
Samsung Galaxy M30s has a much better battery life than LG K92, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.