Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 is a bit better than LG K92, getting an 86.5 score against 85.4. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M31 has newer 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple additional features and performance improvements. The Galaxy M31 design is a little lighter but a little bit thicker than LG K92, and both were released with only 8 months difference.
Galaxy M31 features a little bit better screen than LG K92, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better screen pixels density. LG K92 features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M31, because it has more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a bit better processing power than LG K92. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores. The Galaxy M31 has a bit better camera than LG K92, and although they both have a 64 MP back facing camera, the same video resolution, a same size camera aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M31 also has a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy M31 features a way better battery life than LG K92, because it has a 50% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.