Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Titan gray | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s has a score of 88, which is a bit better than LG K92's 85.4 global score. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M31s has a newer 11 version while LG K92 has Android 10, offering lots of additional features and increased performance. Although Samsung Galaxy M31s is better than LG K92, it must be told that it is also thicker and just a bit heavier.
Galaxy M31s has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG K92. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. The Galaxy M31s has a bit more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy M31s captures a little bit better videos and photos than LG K92, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the same video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
LG K92 features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG K92 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy M31s has a way better battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.