Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Titan gray | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is slightly better than the LG K92, getting an 87.1 score against 85.4. Samsung Galaxy Note9's design is a little bit lighter than LG K92, but it's a bit thicker and was released many years before. The Galaxy Note9 has a little more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Galaxy Note9 has a bit faster processing unit than LG K92. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The LG K92 counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K92 takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy Note9 and LG K92 count with incredibly similar battery performance.
Although Galaxy Note9 is a better device, it costs more money than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG K92. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note9, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG K92, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.