Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s 79.3 general score. These phones use Android operating system, but the LG K92 has the newer 10 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1, so it gives you some extra features and some performance improvements. LG K92's body is way newer than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it's a lot heavier and thicker.
Galaxy S6 edge+ features a more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The LG K92 features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores.
LG K92 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. LG K92 features a superior camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG K92 also has a lot larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures, a lot more MP back camera and a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments.
LG K92 features greater battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG K92 is also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.