Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black and White |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 85.4 score against 77.8. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but LG K92 has 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. The LG K92 construction is just a little lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's thicker and was released 3 years before.
The LG K92 counts with a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better screen than LG K92, because it has a larger screen, a little greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display and a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than LG K92, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots clearer photos and videos than LG K92, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery performance than LG K92, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
LG K92 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.