Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-06 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.14 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is just a bit better than the LG K92, with an 85.5 score against 85.4. Even though the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is extremely older and just a little bit thicker than the LG K92, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a slightly better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit better hardware performance than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 2 GB more RAM. LG K92 captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
LG K92 has a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a battery duration that is just as good as LG K92's battery performance.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a little more money than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG K92. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG K92, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.