Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.11 x 2.55 x 0.42 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 420 hours standby time 18.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is way better than LG Lancet, with an 81.3 score against 57.7. The LG V35 ThinQ is a just a bit heavier but notably thinner device than LG Lancet. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much powerful CPU than LG Lancet, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 7 more CPU cores. The LG V35 ThinQ has a lot better display than LG Lancet, because it has a lot bigger display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a much higher pixels count per inch in the display.
LG V35 ThinQ shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG Lancet, because it has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG Lancet, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much longer battery lifetime than LG Lancet, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than LG Lancet, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.