Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 2.3, 2.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.07 x 2.68 x 0.47 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP 4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (24 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 7.7 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 96 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is much better than LG Optimus 3D's 56.6 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but LG G8X ThinQ has the newer 10 version and LG Optimus 3D has Android 2.3. The LG G8X ThinQ is a somewhat heavier but incredibly thinner cellphone than the LG Optimus 3D.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a little bit better looking screen than LG Optimus 3D, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2340px resolution, a much larger display and a much greater screen pixel density. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than LG Optimus 3D, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a lot better performance than LG Optimus 3D, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with 6 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG G8X ThinQ shoots way better photographs and videos than LG Optimus 3D, because it has a way higher 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a lot larger aperture for better images in low light environments.
LG G8X ThinQ has a much better battery performance than LG Optimus 3D, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 1500mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG G8X ThinQ is also the cheapest, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.