Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.3 | 69.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 4.1, 4.0.3 | Android 10 |
| 2012-02-23 | 2020-06-12 |
| 5.21 x 2.68 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Champagne pink and Midnight blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 399.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 271 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (1066 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ULP GeForce (520 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.37 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3550mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 731 hours standby time 9.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.08 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto E (2020) has a score of 69.7, which is a little bit better than the LG Optimus 4X HD's 63.3 score. The Motorola Moto E (2020) body is a lot newer and a bit thinner, but extremely heavier than LG Optimus 4X HD. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto E (2020) has a more recent 10 version and LG Optimus 4X HD has Android 4.1 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features.
The LG Optimus 4X HD features a sharper screen than Moto E (2020), because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1280 x 720 and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density. The Moto E (2020) has a little faster CPU than LG Optimus 4X HD, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto E (2020) features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Optimus 4X HD, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB and 16 GB more internal memory capacity. Moto E (2020) takes way better pictures and videos than LG Optimus 4X HD, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto E (2020) also has a back facing camera with a way better 13 MP resolution and faster video frame rates.
The Motorola Moto E (2020) features a much longer battery performance than LG Optimus 4X HD, because it has 3550mAh of battery capacity against 2150mAh.
The Motorola Moto E (2020) not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.