Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 4.1.2 | -- |
| 2013-02-21 | 2017-10-19 |
| 4.96 x 2.54 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.62 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 500 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.08 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is much better than the LG Optimus F5, having a general score of 82.5 against 61.1. The Google Pixel 2 XL body is extremely newer and somewhat thinner, but extremely heavier than the LG Optimus F5. Google Pixel 2 XL features a sharper screen than LG Optimus F5, because it has a much higher pixel density, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a lot bigger display.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a faster CPU than LG Optimus F5, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster). Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than LG Optimus F5, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a way better battery duration than LG Optimus F5, because it has a 3520mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 2 XL shoots a lot better photographs and videos than LG Optimus F5, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with much more mega pixels.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also cheap compared to the LG Optimus F5, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.