Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 4.1.2 | -- |
| 2013-02-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.96 x 2.54 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.62 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 500 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is way better than LG Optimus F5, having an 80 score against 61.1. Although the Google Pixel 3 is heavier than LG Optimus F5, it's thinner and way newer. The Google Pixel 3 features a little sharper screen than LG Optimus F5, because it has a lot higher pixels quantity per inch of screen, a lot better 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bigger display.
Google Pixel 3 features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG Optimus F5, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 56 GB more internal memory. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a superior CPU than LG Optimus F5, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 features greater battery performance than LG Optimus F5, because it has a 36 percent more battery size. The Google Pixel 3 features a greater camera than LG Optimus F5, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Google Pixel 3 is a bit more expensive than the LG Optimus F5, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.