Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.6 | 66.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 4.1.2 | -- |
| 2013-02-21 | 2017-06-22 |
| 5.19 x 2.69 x 0.38 inches | 5.69 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.70 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 8920 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 13 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto E4 has an overall score of 66.5, which is a bit better than the LG Optimus F7's 60.6 global score. The Moto E4 body is a lot newer and a little thinner than the LG Optimus F7's, but it is also heavier. LG Optimus F7 features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto E4, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU.
The LG Optimus F7 counts with just a bit better looking display than Moto E4, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1280 x 720px, the LG Optimus F7 also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display. The Moto E4 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG Optimus F7, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 128 GB and 16 GB internal memory capacity.
Moto E4 counts with a bit superior battery life than LG Optimus F7, because it has a 10 percent greater battery capacity. The Motorola Moto E4 takes way better photographs and videos than LG Optimus F7. Both of them have the same 1920x1080 video quality, a same resolution camera in the back and the same video frame rate.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Moto E4 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.