Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.1 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.04 x 2.32 x 0.52 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.69 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 133 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7225AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is a lot better than the LG Optimus L1 II TRI's overall score of 48.9. Samsung Galaxy S9 is a much thinner but notably heavier phone than LG Optimus L1 II TRI. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much powerful processing unit than LG Optimus L1 II TRI, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores and more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features an incredibly better looking screen than LG Optimus L1 II TRI, because it has a way greater amount of pixels per display inch, a really larger screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Galaxy S9 has a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than LG Optimus L1 II TRI, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB.
Galaxy S9 has a very superior battery performance than LG Optimus L1 II TRI, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 1540mAh. Galaxy S9 features a greater camera than LG Optimus L1 II TRI, because it has a way better resolution back camera.
Galaxy S9 costs a little more than the LG Optimus L1 II TRI, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.