Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.1.2 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.06 x 2.62 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1400 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 7.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is way better than LG Optimus L9 II, with an 81.3 score against 59.5. LG V35 ThinQ is a a lot thinner but heavier phone than LG Optimus L9 II. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better processing power than LG Optimus L9 II, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than LG Optimus L9 II, because it has a bigger screen, a much higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better camera than LG Optimus L9 II, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a way more mega-pixels camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a superior memory for games and applications than LG Optimus L9 II, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory. LG V35 ThinQ features a much longer battery life than LG Optimus L9 II, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than the LG Optimus L9 II, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.