Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 44.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.3, 2.3, 2.2 | -- |
| 2010-09-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.47 x 2.32 x 0.52 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.55 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 180 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.84 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 174,08 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (17 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.61 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 450 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than LG Optimus One, getting an 83.8 score against 44.5. Galaxy A50's construction is way newer and thinner, but incredibly heavier than the LG Optimus One. The Galaxy A50 has a sharper display than LG Optimus One, because it has a really larger screen, way more pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Galaxy A50 features a very superior processing power than LG Optimus One, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much better camera than LG Optimus One, because it has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot higher (Full HD) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Optimus One, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB and 127,83 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than LG Optimus One, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a little more than LG Optimus One, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.