Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than the LG Q6's 71.8 global score. Although the LG V50 ThinQ is newer than LG Q6, it is somewhat heavier and a little thicker. The LG V50 ThinQ features a superior hardware performance than LG Q6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking display than LG Q6, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a little higher pixel density and a larger display. LG V50 ThinQ has a much better camera than LG Q6, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Q6, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ features longer battery lifetime than LG Q6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ costs more money than the LG Q6, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.