Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than LG Q6, with a overall score of 91.8 against 71.8. The Galaxy A71 5G construction has the same thickness than the LG Q6, but it's somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better performance than LG Q6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a screen that is just as good as LG Q6's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Q6, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots greater videos and photos than LG Q6, because it has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light situations and a lot higher video definition. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a really longer battery life than LG Q6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is way more expensive than LG Q6, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.