Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2020-08-06 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s is a lot better than LG Q6, having an 88 score against 71.8. Samsung Galaxy M31s's design is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and way heavier than LG Q6. Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a screen that is just as good as LG Q6's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy M31s has a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a bit better processing unit than LG Q6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy M31s features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than LG Q6, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M31s has a way better battery duration than LG Q6, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy M31s captures much better photos and videos than LG Q6, because it has a lot higher resolution back camera, a way better (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.