Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2017-08-02 | 2018-08-24 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is way better than LG Q6, with an 87.1 score against 71.8. Galaxy Note9's design is newer than the LG Q6's, but it is a lot heavier and a bit thicker. The Galaxy Note9 has just a bit better looking display than LG Q6, because it has a larger display, a just a bit better screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 features more memory capacity to install games and applications than LG Q6, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a greater hardware performance than LG Q6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note9 captures better videos and photos than LG Q6, because although it has a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture and a much higher (4K) video quality. Galaxy Note9 features longer battery duration than LG Q6, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 costs a lot more than LG Q6, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.