Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a general score of 79.3, which is better than the LG Q6's 71.8 global score. Galaxy S6 edge+'s construction is thinner than LG Q6, although it's just a bit heavier and was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a more vivid screen than LG Q6, because it has a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px, a quite higher screen density and a little larger display.
The LG Q6 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Q6 counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores (but slower).
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ and LG Q6 both count with similar batteries. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ captures better pictures and videos than LG Q6, because it has a much better video resolution, a back facing camera with a better resolution and a larger camera aperture for better captures in low-light environments.
Although Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Q6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG Q6, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.