Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than LG Q6, with a 77.8 score against 71.8. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is newer and noticeably thinner than the LG Q6's, although it's incredibly heavier. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than LG Q6, because although it has a little bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a lot bigger screen.
The LG Q6 has a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than LG Q6, because it has a way bigger aperture, a back facing camera with way more MP and a much better video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better memory for apps and games than LG Q6, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery duration than LG Q6, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Q6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG Q6, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.