Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-20 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a general score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than the LG Q60's 73.9 overall score. Despite of the fact Google Nexus 6P is incredibly older and a little heavier than LG Q60, it's construction is still thinner. Google Nexus 6P has a sharper screen than LG Q60, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much better pixel number per screen inch.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit faster processor than LG Q60. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 3 GB of RAM. Google Nexus 6P features a bit better camera than LG Q60, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
LG Q60 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Google Nexus 6P's battery performance is just as good as LG Q60's battery duration, although the Google Nexus 6P has a 1 percent smaller battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.