Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is much better than the LG Q60's general score of 73.9. Google Pixel 2's design is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG Q60, although it was released a bit more further than a year before. The Google Pixel 2 has a little bit better performance than LG Q60, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG Q60, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a way greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a better 1080 x 1920 resolution. The LG Q60 has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 2 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than LG Q60, because although it has a lot less MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The LG Q60 counts with superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.