Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-20 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s is much better than the LG Q60, having a general score of 83.3 against 73.9. Even being the best in this comparison review, it must be noted that it is also a just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M30s has an older 11 version while LG Q60 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a bit sharper screen than LG Q60, because it has a lot higher display pixel density, a little bigger screen and a way higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a bit more powerful processor than LG Q60, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also has more RAM memory.
The LG Q60 counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Q60 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M30s features a much better camera than LG Q60, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also has a much more megapixels back camera, a lot better (4K) video quality and a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a very superior battery duration than LG Q60, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.